Administrative and criminal law analysis of countering cybercrimes in the field of illicit drug trafficking at the regional and local levels

Received: 24-Dec-2025, Manuscript No. JDAR-26-183332; Editor assigned: 26-Dec-2025, Pre QC No. JDAR-26-183332 (PQ); Reviewed: 09-Jan-2026, QC No. JDAR-26-183332; Revised: 16-Jan-2026, Manuscript No. JDAR-26-183332 (R); Published: 23-Jan-2026, DOI: 10.4303/JDAR/236485

Introduction

The current stage of development of the information society is characterized by the rapid digitalization of almost all spheres of social relations, which, along with positive consequences, leads to the emergence of new forms of criminal activity. One of the most dangerous trends is the transformation of the illicit trafficking of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors in cyberspace. The use of information and communication technologies, social networks, encrypted messengers, darknet resources and cryptocurrencies significantly complicates the activities of law enforcement agencies and reduces the effectiveness of traditional mechanisms of state control [1-3].

Cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking is acquiring a stable systemic character, combining the features of organized, transnational and high-tech crime. At the same time, the regional and local levels play a key role in the implementation of state countermeasure policy, since it is at these levels that prevention, primary detection of offenses, documentation of criminal activity and interaction with the population are carried out. At the same time, limited resources, fragmented powers and insufficient digital capacity of public authorities negatively affect the effectiveness of such activities [4].

The problem becomes particularly relevant in the context of the need for coordinated use of administrative and criminal law means of counteraction. Administrative and legal mechanisms are traditionally focused on prevention, control and regulation, while criminal law instruments are aimed at bringing guilty persons to justice and ensuring the inevitability of punishment. In the context of digitalization, there is a need for new forms of interaction between these components that take into account the specifics of cyberspace and the speed of transformation of criminal practices [5].

The scientific novelty of the study is due to the insufficient development in legal science of a comprehensive analysis of counteraction to cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking, specifically at the regional and local levels. Most scientific works focus either on the general theoretical aspects of cybercrime or on the criminal-legal characteristics of drug crimes, leaving out of consideration the administrative-legal component and the issue of interlevel coordination [6,7].

The purpose of the article is to carry out an administrative-legal and criminal-legal analysis of the mechanisms for countering cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking at the regional and local levels, as well as to substantiate the directions for improving legal regulation and the practice of their application. To achieve this goal, the following tasks have been identified: to identify the main forms of manifestation of cyberdrug crime; to analyze administrative-legal and criminal-legal instruments of counteraction; to investigate the features of their interaction at the regional and local levels; to formulate proposals for increasing the effectiveness of state policy in this area.

Methods

The methodological basis of the study is a set of general scientific, special legal and interdisciplinary approaches that provide a comprehensive analysis of counteraction to cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking at the regional and local levels.

The dialectical method was used to clarify the patterns of drug crime development in the context of digitalization and the interconnection of administrative-legal and criminal-legal mechanisms. An example is the analysis of the transformation of traditional forms of drug sales into digital ones (online platforms, messengers, darknet) and the corresponding evolution of legal means of response [8,9].

The system-structural method made it possible to consider counteraction to cyberdrug crime as a holistic system that includes regulatory legal acts, public administration entities, law enforcement agencies and digital control tools [10]. For example, at the regional level, the interaction of local governments, units of the National Police and cyberpolice within the framework of the implementation of drug crime countermeasure programs was analyzed [11,12].

The formal legal method was used to study the content of the norms of administrative and criminal legislation that regulate liability for illegal drug trafficking using information and communication technologies. In particular, the composition of offenses and crimes in which cyberspace acts as a means or environment for their commission was analyzed [13].

The comparative legal method was used to compare national approaches to countering cyber drug crime with the practices of other states and international standards. As an example, a comparison of administrative and legal prevention measures and criminal legal liability mechanisms with the provisions of the Budapest convention on cybercrime was carried out [14].

The logical-legal method allowed us to formulate theoretical generalizations and conclusions regarding the effectiveness of existing countermeasures, as well as to substantiate proposals for improving legal regulation. An example is the determination of the ratio of preventive administrative measures and repressive criminal law measures at the local level [15].

Statistical and analytical methods were used to summarize official data from law enforcement agencies and international organizations on the prevalence of cybercrimes related to drug trafficking. In particular, generalized indicators of identified online sales channels and the results of their blocking were used.

The use of these methods in combination ensured the comprehensiveness, objectivity and scientific validity of the research results.

Results and Discussion

Cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking is a complex socio-legal phenomenon that combines traditional drug crimes with the use of modern information and communication technologies [16]. Its essence lies in the illegal use of the digital environment for the purpose of organizing, coordinating, concealing and ensuring the illegal production, sale, shipment and distribution of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and their analogues. This form of criminal activity is characterized by a high level of latency, transnationality and difficulty in identifying the subjects of offenses [17,18].

Unlike traditional forms of illicit drug trafficking, cybercrime in this area operates mainly in virtual space, which provides criminals with anonymity, efficiency and a wide audience of potential consumers. The use of social networks, messengers, internet forums, darknet platforms and specialized web resources allows illegal drug sales without direct physical contact between the seller and the buyer, which significantly reduces the risk of detection [19].

The main manifestations of cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking are, firstly, the creation and administration of online platforms and communication channels for advertising and selling drugs. Such resources are often disguised as legal content or use encryption and special access algorithms. Secondly, a common manifestation is the use of electronic payment systems, cryptocurrencies and other digital financial instruments in order to hide the origin of funds and make them untraceable [20].

Thirdly, a characteristic feature of cybercrime in drug trafficking is the use of distance selling technologies, in particular the so-called “bookmark” system, the coordination of which is carried out through digital services. In this context, cyberspace acts not only as a means of communication, but also as a key element of the criminal mechanism. Fourthly, cybercrime in the field of drug trafficking is manifested in the use of software tools to hide digital traces, in particular VPN services, anonymizers and the Tor network [21].

An important feature of the analyzed phenomenon is its ability to quickly adapt to changes in legal regulation and law enforcement activities. Cyber-drug crime is characterized by a high level of organization, a clear division of roles between participants and the use of modern technological solutions, which necessitates the improvement of both administrative-legal and criminal-legal mechanisms of counteraction [22].

Thus, the essence of cyber-crime in the field of illicit drug trafficking lies in the transformation of traditional drug crimes under the influence of the digitalization of society, and its manifestations reflect new forms of illegal behavior that require a comprehensive legal response. Awareness of the specifics of this phenomenon is a necessary prerequisite for the formation of an effective state policy to combat cyber-drug crime at the national, regional and local levels [23].

Administrative and legal means of combating cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking

Administrative and legal means of combating cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking play a key role in the formation of a preventive and organizational mechanism for combating this socially dangerous phenomenon. At the regional and local levels, their importance is due to the possibility of a prompt response to manifestations of cyberdrug crime, the implementation of preventive measures and the coordination of the activities of public authorities [24].

The essence of administrative and legal means is the application of administrative law norms, management procedures and organizational tools aimed at preventing, identifying and minimizing the risks of illicit drug trafficking using information and communication technologies. They complement criminal and legal measures, ensuring early intervention by the state even before serious crimes are committed [25].

The main administrative and legal means of combating cybercrime in this area include, first of all, regulatory measures that provide for the establishment of rules for the functioning of the digital environment, restriction of access to illegal content and definition of the powers of public authorities in the field of cybersecurity. At the regional and local levels, such measures are implemented through acts of executive authorities and local governments aimed at ensuring information security and protecting public order [26].

An important place is occupied by administrative and organizational means that cover the activities of authorized structures in monitoring the Internet space, identifying online resources related to illegal drug trafficking, and interacting with telecommunications providers and administrators of digital platforms. In practice, the effectiveness of such measures largely depends on the level of coordination between territorial units of law enforcement agencies, local governments and specialized entities in the field of cybersecurity [27].

A separate group is made up of preventive administrative and legal measures, which are implemented through information and awareness campaigns, educational programs and social initiatives at the regional and local levels. Their goal is to reduce the demand for drugs, form the digital literacy of the population and raise awareness of the risks of involvement in illegal activities on the Internet. It is prevention that allows you to influence the social prerequisites of cyber drug crime, reducing its spread [28].

No less important are administrative and jurisdictional measures, in particular, bringing persons to administrative responsibility for offenses related to violation of the rules for the circulation of information, advertising of drugs on the Internet or failure to comply with the legal requirements of authorized bodies. Such measures are disciplinary in nature and contribute to the formation of lawful behavior in the digital environment [29].

An analysis of the practice of applying administrative and legal means at the regional and local levels indicates the presence of problems related to the fragmentation of legal regulation, insufficient clarity of the competence of local government bodies, and limited resources for cyber monitoring. This necessitates the need to improve the administrative and legal mechanism for combating cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking by strengthening interdepartmental cooperation and a clear division of powers [30] (Table 1).

The conducted administrative-legal and criminal-legal analysis showed that cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking at the regional and local levels has acquired a stable systemic character, which is due to the active use of digital technologies as a tool for organizing, coordinating and masking illegal activities. The results obtained confirm the tendency to shift traditional forms of drug crime into virtual space, which significantly complicates its detection and suppression.

Within the framework of the administrative-legal analysis, it was established that the current system of prevention of cybercrime in the field of drug trafficking at the regional and local levels is not sufficiently coordinated. Administrative measures aimed at monitoring internet resources, restricting access to illegal content and preventing offenses are applied fragmentarily and do not have a clear regulatory framework regarding the role of local governments. This results in limited impact on the prevention of cyber-drug crime and reduces the overall effectiveness of administrative response [31].

The criminal-legal analysis showed that the existing categories of crimes related to the illicit trafficking of drugs generally include the use of information and communication technologies, but do not always take into account the increased level of public danger of cyber-criminal forms of such activity. The lack of clearly defined qualifying features related to the use of digital platforms, anonymous networks and electronic payment systems complicates law enforcement practice on the ground and does not contribute to the formation of a unified approach to the qualification of relevant crimes [32].

The problem of interaction between subjects of counteraction to cyber-crime at the regional and local levels deserves special attention. The results of the study indicate insufficient coordination between law enforcement agencies, cybersecurity units, executive authorities and local governments. The lack of stable mechanisms for information exchange and joint response negatively affects the timeliness of detecting cyber drug channels and bringing perpetrators to justice [33].

Discussing the results obtained, it should be noted that effective counteraction to cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking requires a comprehensive combination of administrative-legal and criminal-legal instruments. Administrative measures should perform preventive and service-organizational functions aimed at early detection of risks and minimizing the spread of illegal content, while criminal-legal mechanisms should ensure the inevitability of punishment for committing cyber drug crimes [34].

Thus, the results of the study confirm the need to improve the regulatory and legal regulation of counteraction to cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking, taking into account regional and local specifics. The proposed approach allows to increase the efficiency of law enforcement practice, strengthen the preventive component, and ensure the proper level of protection of public interests in the digital environment [35].

Conclusion

As a result of the conducted administrative-legal and criminal-legal analysis of counteraction to cybercrimes in the field of illicit drug trafficking at the regional and local levels, it was established that the digitalization of drug crime necessitates a comprehensive and systematic response from the state and local governments. Cyberspace significantly expands the possibilities of illicit drug trafficking, complicates the detection of offenses and requires the use of special legal and technical tools.

It is substantiated that administrative-legal mechanisms play a key preventive role, ensuring prevention, monitoring and elimination of conditions conducive to the commission of cybercrimes in the field of illicit drug trafficking. At the same time, their effectiveness at the regional and local levels is limited by insufficient clarity of powers, resource limitations and fragmentation of interagency interaction.

Criminal law principles of counteraction are aimed at directly responding to the most dangerous manifestations of cybercrime in the field of illicit drug trafficking. At the same time, it has been established that the problems of proof, identification of individuals in cyberspace and the cross-border nature of criminal activity significantly complicate the implementation of criminal liability, especially at the local level.

It has been proven that effective counteraction to cybercrime in the studied area is possible only under the condition of coordinated application of administrative and criminal law instruments, strengthening of coordination between law enforcement agencies, executive authorities and local self-government, as well as active involvement of civil society institutions.

It was concluded that further improvement of the countermeasure system should include harmonization of legislation taking into account the cyber component of drug crime, development of institutional capacity of regional and local authorities, introduction of modern digital monitoring technologies, and expansion of international cooperation in the field of combating cybercrime and illicit drug trafficking.

Acknowledgement

None.

Conflict of Interest

Authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References

1. Criminology course: General part: (Textbook)/by the general editor, 2001:352.
2. Criminology. General part. Textbook. Collection of authors A.B. Blaga, I.G. Bogatyrev, L.M. Davydenko and others, edited by O.M. Bandurka, Kharkiv Publ KhNUVS, 2011:176.
3. V. Davydenko, M. Korniienko, A. Radchuk, A. Babiak, Y. Leheza. International cooperation in operational and search activities: A comparative analysis of foreign experience, Cadernos de Dereito Actual, (2025):83-102.

   [Google Scholar]

4. A.V. Halyuk. Main forms of interaction of territorial bodies of the national police of Ukraine with state authorities, the population, territorial communities, civil society institutions and the media in order to reduce drug addiction among the population of Ukraine. Priorities for the development of legal sciences in the 21st century: international scientific and practical conference, Odessa, April 12–13, 2019, Odesa: NGO "Prichornomorska Fundatsiya Prava", (2019):90-93.
5. S. Kniaziev, O. Morhunov, I. Samokhvalova, Y. Tymoshenko, A. Smirnov. Manipulation of sports competitions: Investigation and prevention, Pak J Criminol, 16(2024):1111-1126.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

6. M. Korniienko, A. Desyatnik, G. Didkivska, Y. Leheza, O. Titarenkо. Peculiarities of investigating criminal offenses related to illegal turnover of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogues or precursors: Criminal law aspect, Khazanah Hukum, 5(2023):205-215.

   [Crossref]

7. S. Kozlovskyi, D. Bilenko, O. Dluhopolskyi, S. Vitvitskyi, O. Bondarenko, O. Korniichuk. Determinants of COVID-19 death rate in Europe: Empirical analysis, Problemy Ekorozwoju Problems of Sustainable Development, 16(2021):17-28.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

8. O. Krupytskyi, P. Dikhtiievskyi, D. Krylov, M. Balamush, Y. Leheza. Standards and safeguards stemming from the right to respect for private life and the right to a fair trial: applicability with respect to administrative-law matters of civil service, Rev Eletronica Direito Sociedade, 12(2024):1.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

9. Y. Leheza, M. Yankovyi, N. Medvedenko, T. Vaida, M. Koval. Application of artificial intelligence in motivating court decisions: Legal basis and foreign experience, Al-Risalah, 24(2024):58-69.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

10. Y. Leheza, B. Shcherbyna, Y. Leheza, O. Pushkina, O. Marchenko. Features of applying the right to suspension or complete/partial refusal to fulfill a duty in case of non-fulfilment of the counter duty by the other party according to the civil legislation of Ukraine, Revista Jurídica Portucalense, (2023):340-59.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

11. Y. Leheza, K. Pisotska, O. Dubenko, O. Dakhno, A. Sotskyi. The essence of the principles of Ukrainian law in modern jurisprudence, Revista Jurídica Portucalense, (2023):342-63.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

12. Y. Leheza, L. Yerofieienko. Peculiarities of legal regulation of intellectual property protection in Ukraine under martial law: Administrative and civil aspects, Rev Just Direito, 37(2023):157.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

13. Y. Leheza, O. Kulinich, T. Zhuravlova, Y. Khainatskyi, S. Sainchyn. Combating corruption offenses: Foreign experience, theoretical, practical, legal regulations, and improvement, Jurnal Hukum Islam, 23(2025):304-34.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

14. Y. Leheza, S. Volodymyr, Irina V. Aristova, Ivan O. Kravchenko, K. Tatiana. Foreign experience in legal regulation of combating crime in the sphere of trafficking of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogues and precursors: Administrative and criminal aspect, J Drug Alcohol Res, 12(2023):1-8.
15. Y. Leheza. Administrative legal guarantees and standards arising from the right to respect for private life and the right to a fair trial in the field of civil service, Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual, 26(2025):423-436.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

16. Y. Leheza, O. Dubenko, L. Pavlyk, O. Prasov, V. Pavlov. Foreign experience of responsibility for driving vehicles in condition of alcohol intoxication: International standards, administrative and criminal aspects, Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 35(2024):161-74.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

17. Y. Leheza, A. Kuzmenko, O. Pashchenko, V. Tulyantseva, Y. Leheza. Sources of environmental law: National legislation of Ukraine and international legal documents. AJWEP, 22(2025):025160118.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

18. M. Kızıloğlu, O. Dluhopolskyi, V. Koziuk, S. Vitvitskyi, S. Kozlovskyi. Dark personality traits and job performance of employees: The mediating role of perfectionism, stress, and social media addiction, Probl Perspect Manag, 19(2021):533-544.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

19. O.M. Yaroshenko, S.S. Vitvitskyi, O.S. Nesterovych, O.H. Sereda, O.A. Yakovlyev. Legal protection of employee privacy in the workplace, J Leg Aff Disput Resolut Eng Constr, 17(2025):04525003.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

20. On measures to combat illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogues or precursors and their abuse: Law of Ukraine dated 15.02.1995 No. 62/95-ВР.
21. On some issues of conducting activities related to the trafficking of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors: Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine: Dated 10 Jan. 2018 No. 9. Official Gazette of Ukraine. 2018. No. 20. Art. 669. Counteraction to corruption crime in Ukraine: A textbook. (2010):308.
22. S.M. Pavkovych. Administrative powers of the national police to ensure counteraction to illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs: The genesis of scientific views and legal support, Current Problems of Domestic Jurisprudence, 4(2017):302-308.
23. B.A. Pidgorny. Administration of counteraction to illicit trafficking in synthetic narcotic drugs in Ukraine, Kharkiv, (2016):22.
24. S.S. Vitvitskiy, O.N. Kurakin, P.S. Pokataev, O.M. Skriabin, D.B. Sanakoiev. Peculiarities of cybercrime investigation in the banking sector of Ukraine: Review and analysis, Banks and Bank Systems, 16(2021):69.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

25. V. Shablystyi, V. Prymachenko, A. Filipp, L. Doroshenko, V. Burbyka. Legal principles of cyber protection of critical infrastructure facilities, JLERI, 22(2019):1-6.
26. N.V. Shchedrin. Fundamentals of the general theory of crime prevention. Textbook. Krasnoyarsk, (1999):142.
27. O. Shkuta, Y. Leheza, I. Telelym, A. Anosienkov, O. Yaroshak. National security in the conditions of the Russia-Ukraine war: Legal regulation and Islamic law perspectives, Al-Ahkam, 34(2024):99-120.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

28. O. Shkuta, K. Dmytro, P. Olena, P. Mykola, V. Olena. Object and subject of state control in the sphere of legal turnover of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and their precursors in Ukraine: Administrative, criminal and civil-legal aspect, J Drug Alc Res, 12(2023).
29. S.S. Vitvitskyi, M.I. Liubchenko, O.O. Liubchenko. COVID 19-related stigmatization: A human rights-based approach, Wiadomości Lekarskie, 74(2021):2972.
30. Y. Volkova, B. Bon, A. Borysenko, Y. Leheza, Y. Leheza. Crypto market experience: Navigating regulatory challenges in modern conditions, Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 24(2024):178-194.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

31. O. Volobuieva, Y. Leheza, V. Pervii, Y. Plokhuta, R. Pichko. Criminal and administrative legal characteristics of offenses in the field of countering drug trafficking: Insights from Ukraine, Yustisia, 12(2023):262-77.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

32. T. Voloshanivska, P. Inna, L. Serhii, M. Olha, L. Yevhen. Administrative and criminal law aspects of preventing offenses committed by minors in the sphere of illegal circulation of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and precursors,  J Drug Alc Res,  12(2023):1-6.
33. A.M. Voloshchuk. State legal policy to combat illicit drug trafficking in Ukraine: monograph. Odessa, (2012):328.
34. O. Yunin, A. Dal, V. Polovnikov, N. Shumska, M. Koteliukh. The Administrative-legal and criminal aspect of prosecuting persons for offenses in the field of illegal drug trafficking, J Drug Alc Res, (2024).
35. O. Yunin, S. Nikolaichuk, O. Brusakova, I. Kravchenko, M. Kolesnikova. Administrative and legal status of district administrative courts in the administrative justice system, J Legal Ethical Regul, 24(2021).

    [Google Scholar]

Citation: © 2026 Pylyp Yepryntsev, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.